« Gay's cock | Main | Frank O'Hara's animals »

Word for the wise ©

Here we are at "D" and our Word for the wise © today is George Orwell's brilliant diagnosis of the simultaneous accommodation of fact and myth.

doublethink Winston Smith has his seminal insight into the workings of Ingsoc as he clandestinely reads War is Peace, the third chapter of Emmanuel Goldstein's The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism: "Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously and accepting both of them... Doublethink lies at the heart of Ingsoc, since the essential act of the Party is to use conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty."

The abuse of language is at the centre of the dystopia Orwell created in Nineteen Eighty-Four (first published in 1949). In this age of "Political Correctness", his Newspeak is a warning to us all about what can happen when tyrants gain control of semantics, history and media. So far, this has happened only in places like the USSR and China, but we've been warned. Because Orwell is so special, here's one more example of his perception:

"The words Communist International, for instance, call up a composite picture of universal human brotherhood, red flags, barricades, Karl Marx, and the Paris Commune. The word Comintern, on the other hand, suggests merely a tightly-knit organization and a well-defined body of doctrine... Comintern is a word that can be uttered almost without taking thought, whereas Communist International is a phrase over which one is obliged to linger at least momentarily."

Superb. Next week, "earl" and "extermination" are among the "E" candidates.



TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.eamonn.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/825

Comments

If you limit the vocabulary available, people cannot express how they really feel.

I'm not so sure that you could call Ingsoc's attempt to restrict language as Political Correctness. Newspeak wasn't conceived for the purpose of correcting social injustices etc.

You say that Newspeak wasn't conceived for the purpose of correcting social injustices--are you saying that Policital Correctness was? That strikes me as terribly naive (quite apart from the aptness of the comparison between Newspeak and PC). How is it possible to understand PC as anything but another attempt to impose ideological constraints on discourse? And ideology is always in the service of power--its preservation or its accumulation. Right? Or not?

If you limit the vocabulary available, people cannot express how they really feel.

But aren't conventions of policitally correct speech (and their legal precipitations as hate-speech laws) intended to do this very thing? PC speech and hate-speech laws are attempts to "limit the vocabulary available". Und wer 'A' sagt, muss auch 'B' sagen.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Movable Type


Honoured member of the Rainy Day family